Goldshell CK-BOX vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell CK-BOX | Specification | iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 1.1 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.8 TH/s |
| 215 W | Consommation électrique | 295 W |
| 204.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 163.9 J/TH |
| 45 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 2.0 kg | Weight | 2.2 kg |
| 734 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,007 BTU/hr |
| 59/100 | Home Mining Score | 34/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithme | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell CK-BOX
iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)
Based on BTC price of $77,900 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 71% more hashrate (1.1 vs 1.8 TH/s) in the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)'s favour. The Goldshell CK-BOX holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell CK-BOX and iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) sit on each measurable spec:
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) 71% more hashrate (1.1 vs 1.8 TH/s)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 27% better power draw (215 vs 295 W)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) 20% better efficacité (205 vs 164 J/TH)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 8% better weight (2.0 vs 2.2 kg)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) 37% more heat output (734 vs 1,007 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 74% more score de minage domestique (59.0 vs 34.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell CK-BOX | Metric | iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $399 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $238 |
| -$0.48 | Daily net profit | -$0.64 |
| -$574 | Net after 1 year | -$473 |
| -$748 | Net after 2 years | -$708 |
| -$923 | Net after 3 years | -$943 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell CK-BOXScore: 59/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)163.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell CK-BOX vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell CK-BOX is more profitable at $-0.48/day compared to $-0.64/day for the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell CK-BOX or the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell CK-BOX is quieter at 45 dB compared to the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell CK-BOX vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th): which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell CK-BOX scores 59/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 34/100 for the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell CK-BOX and iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) on J/TH?
The Goldshell CK-BOX runs at 204.8 J/TH while the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) runs at 163.9 J/TH — a difference of 40.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 20% better efficacité (205 vs 164 J/TH).