IceRiver KS0 vs Iceriver KAS KS5M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS0 | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS5M |
|---|---|---|
| 100.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 15.0 TH/s |
| 65 W | Consommation électrique | 3,400 W |
| 650.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 226.7 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 2.5 kg | Weight | 15.0 kg |
| 222 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS0
Iceriver KAS KS5M
Based on BTC price of $78,195 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Iceriver KAS KS5M edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 14900% more hashrate (0.1 vs 15.0 TH/s). The IceRiver KS0 claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The IceRiver KS0 and Iceriver KAS KS5M diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Iceriver KAS KS5M 14900% more hashrate (0.1 vs 15.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS0 98% better power draw (65.0 vs 3,400.0 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS5M 65% better efficacité (650 vs 227 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS0 53% better noise (35.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- IceRiver KS0 83% better weight (2.5 vs 15.0 kg)
- Iceriver KAS KS5M 5130% more heat output (222 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS0 97% more score de minage domestique (71.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| IceRiver KS0 | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS5M |
|---|---|---|
| $99 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $449 |
| -$0.15 | Daily net profit | -$7.62 |
| -$155 | Net after 1 year | -$3,230 |
| -$210 | Net after 2 years | -$6,012 |
| -$266 | Net after 3 years | -$8,793 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS0Score: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS5M226.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the IceRiver KS0 or the Iceriver KAS KS5M?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS0 is more profitable at $-0.15/day compared to $-7.62/day for the Iceriver KAS KS5M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the IceRiver KS0 or the Iceriver KAS KS5M better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The IceRiver KS0 is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Iceriver KAS KS5M at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the IceRiver KS0 or Iceriver KAS KS5M?
The IceRiver KS0 scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver KAS KS5M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between IceRiver KS0 and Iceriver KAS KS5M?
The IceRiver KS0 runs at 650.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS5M runs at 226.7 J/TH — a difference of 423.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 65% better efficacité (650 vs 227 J/TH).