IceRiver KS0 vs Iceriver KS1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS0 | Specification | Iceriver KS1 |
|---|---|---|
| 100.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.0 TH/s |
| 65 W | Consommation électrique | 600 W |
| 650.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 600.0 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 2.5 kg | Weight | 14.9 kg |
| 222 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,047 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS0
Iceriver KS1
Based on BTC price of $78,186 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Iceriver KS1 comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 900% more hashrate (0.1 vs 1.0 TH/s) in the Iceriver KS1's favour. The IceRiver KS0 holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the IceRiver KS0 and Iceriver KS1 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Iceriver KS1 900% more hashrate (0.1 vs 1.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS0 89% better power draw (65.0 vs 600.0 W)
- Iceriver KS1 8% better efficacité (650 vs 600 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS0 53% better noise (35.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- IceRiver KS0 83% better weight (2.5 vs 14.9 kg)
- Iceriver KS1 823% more heat output (222 vs 2,047 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS0 61% more score de minage domestique (71.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| IceRiver KS0 | Metric | Iceriver KS1 |
|---|---|---|
| $99 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $199 |
| -$0.15 | Daily net profit | -$1.40 |
| -$155 | Net after 1 year | -$711 |
| -$210 | Net after 2 years | -$1,224 |
| -$266 | Net after 3 years | -$1,736 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS0Score: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KS1600.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the IceRiver KS0 or the Iceriver KS1?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS0 is more profitable at $-0.15/day compared to $-1.40/day for the Iceriver KS1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
IceRiver KS0 vs Iceriver KS1: which runs at a lower noise level?
The IceRiver KS0 is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Iceriver KS1 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
IceRiver KS0 vs Iceriver KS1: which fits a residential setup better?
The IceRiver KS0 scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 44/100 for the Iceriver KS1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
IceRiver KS0 vs Iceriver KS1: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The IceRiver KS0 runs at 650.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KS1 runs at 600.0 J/TH — a difference of 50.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 8% better efficacité (650 vs 600 J/TH).