IceRiver KS0 vs Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS0 | Specification | Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) |
|---|---|---|
| 100.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 10.5 TH/s |
| 65 W | Consommation électrique | 3,600 W |
| 650.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 342.9 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 2.5 kg | Weight | 14.5 kg |
| 222 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,283 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | Dragonball |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS0
Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)
Based on BTC price of $78,195 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T), which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 10400% more hashrate (0.1 vs 10.5 TH/s). The IceRiver KS0 claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the IceRiver KS0 and Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) sit on each measurable spec:
- Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) 10400% more hashrate (0.1 vs 10.5 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS0 98% better power draw (65.0 vs 3,600.0 W)
- Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) 47% better efficacité (650 vs 343 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS0 53% better noise (35.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- IceRiver KS0 83% better weight (2.5 vs 14.5 kg)
- Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) 5438% more heat output (222 vs 12,283 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS0 137% more score de minage domestique (71.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| IceRiver KS0 | Metric | Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) |
|---|---|---|
| $99 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,540 |
| -$0.15 | Daily net profit | -$8.26 |
| -$155 | Net after 1 year | -$8,556 |
| -$210 | Net after 2 years | -$11,571 |
| -$266 | Net after 3 years | -$14,587 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS0Score: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)342.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
IceRiver KS0 vs Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS0 is more profitable at $-0.15/day compared to $-8.26/day for the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the IceRiver KS0 or Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)?
The IceRiver KS0 is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the IceRiver KS0 or the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)?
The IceRiver KS0 scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the IceRiver KS0 and Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) on J/TH?
The IceRiver KS0 runs at 650.0 J/TH while the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) runs at 342.9 J/TH — a difference of 307.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 47% better efficacité (650 vs 343 J/TH).