IceRiver KS1 vs Iceriver KS5L
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS1 | Specification | Iceriver KS5L |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 12.0 TH/s |
| 600 W | Consommation électrique | 3,400 W |
| 600.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 283.3 J/TH |
| 65 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 15.0 kg | Weight | 15.0 kg |
| 2,047 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 51/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS1
Iceriver KS5L
Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Iceriver KS5L l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 1100% more hashrate (1.0 vs 12.0 TH/s). The IceRiver KS1 claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The IceRiver KS1 and Iceriver KS5L diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Iceriver KS5L 1100% more hashrate (1.0 vs 12.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS1 82% better power draw (600 vs 3,400 W)
- Iceriver KS5L 53% better efficacité (600 vs 283 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS1 13% better noise (65.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Iceriver KS5L 467% more heat output (2,047 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS1 42% more score de minage domestique (51.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| IceRiver KS1 | Metric | Iceriver KS5L |
|---|---|---|
| $2,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $400 |
| -$1.40 | Daily net profit | -$7.73 |
| -$3,012 | Net after 1 year | -$3,221 |
| -$3,525 | Net after 2 years | -$6,041 |
| -$4,037 | Net after 3 years | -$8,862 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS1Score: 51/100. 65 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KS5L283.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
IceRiver KS1 vs Iceriver KS5L: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS1 is more profitable at $-1.40/day compared to $-7.73/day for the Iceriver KS5L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the IceRiver KS1 or Iceriver KS5L?
The IceRiver KS1 is quieter at 65 dB compared to the Iceriver KS5L at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
IceRiver KS1 vs Iceriver KS5L: which fits a residential setup better?
The IceRiver KS1 scores 51/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver KS5L). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
IceRiver KS1 vs Iceriver KS5L: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The IceRiver KS1 runs at 600.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KS5L runs at 283.3 J/TH — a difference of 316.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 53% better efficacité (600 vs 283 J/TH).