IceRiver KS2 vs Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS2 | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 4.2 TH/s |
| 1,200 W | Consommation électrique | 500 W |
| 600.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 119.1 J/TH |
| 65 dB | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| 15.0 kg | Weight | 4.0 kg |
| 4,094 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,706 BTU/hr |
| 52/100 | Home Mining Score | 62/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS2
Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite
Based on BTC price of $78,210 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite comes out ahead — it takes 6 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 80% better efficacité (600 vs 119 J/TH). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The IceRiver KS2 and Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 110% more hashrate (2.0 vs 4.2 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 58% better power draw (1,200 vs 500 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 80% better efficacité (600 vs 119 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 23% better noise (65.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 73% better weight (15.0 vs 4.0 kg)
- IceRiver KS2 140% more heat output (4,094 vs 1,706 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 19% more score de minage domestique (52.0 vs 62.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| IceRiver KS2 | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| $5,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $699 |
| -$2.81 | Daily net profit | -$1.05 |
| -$6,025 | Net after 1 year | -$1,082 |
| -$7,050 | Net after 2 years | -$1,465 |
| -$8,075 | Net after 3 years | -$1,847 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KAS KS7 LiteScore: 62/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite119.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
IceRiver KS2 vs Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite is more profitable at $-1.05/day compared to $-2.81/day for the IceRiver KS2. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
IceRiver KS2 vs Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite is quieter at 50 dB compared to the IceRiver KS2 at 65 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
IceRiver KS2 vs Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite: which fits a residential setup better?
The Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 52/100 for the IceRiver KS2). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between IceRiver KS2 and Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite?
The IceRiver KS2 runs at 600.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite runs at 119.1 J/TH — a difference of 481.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 80% better efficacité (600 vs 119 J/TH).