IceRiver KS3M vs Goldshell KA BOX Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS3M | Specification | Goldshell KA BOX Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 6.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.6 TH/s |
| 3,400 W | Consommation électrique | 600 W |
| 566.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 375.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 55 dB |
| 14.4 kg | Weight | 2.6 kg |
| 11,601 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,047 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 58/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS3M
Goldshell KA BOX Pro
Based on BTC price of $78,210 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell KA BOX Pro comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 6 (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 82% better power draw (3,400 vs 600 W). That said, the IceRiver KS3M isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the IceRiver KS3M and Goldshell KA BOX Pro actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- IceRiver KS3M 275% more hashrate (6.0 vs 1.6 TH/s)
- Goldshell KA BOX Pro 82% better power draw (3,400 vs 600 W)
- Goldshell KA BOX Pro 34% better efficacité (567 vs 375 J/TH)
- Goldshell KA BOX Pro 27% better noise (75.0 vs 55.0 dB)
- Goldshell KA BOX Pro 82% better weight (14.4 vs 2.6 kg)
- IceRiver KS3M 467% more heat output (11,601 vs 2,047 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell KA BOX Pro 61% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 58.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| IceRiver KS3M | Metric | Goldshell KA BOX Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $8,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $129 |
| -$7.94 | Daily net profit | -$1.38 |
| -$11,400 | Net after 1 year | -$634 |
| -$14,299 | Net after 2 years | -$1,138 |
| -$17,199 | Net after 3 years | -$1,643 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell KA BOX ProScore: 58/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KA BOX Pro375.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the IceRiver KS3M or Goldshell KA BOX Pro more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KA BOX Pro is more profitable at $-1.38/day compared to $-7.94/day for the IceRiver KS3M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the IceRiver KS3M or the Goldshell KA BOX Pro better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell KA BOX Pro is quieter at 55 dB compared to the IceRiver KS3M at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the IceRiver KS3M or Goldshell KA BOX Pro?
The Goldshell KA BOX Pro scores 58/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the IceRiver KS3M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the IceRiver KS3M and Goldshell KA BOX Pro on J/TH?
The IceRiver KS3M runs at 566.7 J/TH while the Goldshell KA BOX Pro runs at 375.0 J/TH — a difference of 191.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 34% better efficacité (567 vs 375 J/TH).