IceRiver KS3M vs Iceriver KS0
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS3M | Specification | Iceriver KS0 |
|---|---|---|
| 6.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 100.0 GH/s |
| 3,400 W | Consommation électrique | 65 W |
| 566.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 650.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14.4 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 11,601 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 222 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS3M
Iceriver KS0
Based on BTC price of $78,210 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the IceRiver KS3M, which leads on 3 of 4 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 5900% more hashrate (6.0 vs 0.1 TH/s). The Iceriver KS0 holds the edge in consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the IceRiver KS3M and Iceriver KS0 sit on each measurable spec:
- IceRiver KS3M 5900% more hashrate (6.0 vs 0.1 TH/s)
- Iceriver KS0 98% better power draw (3,400.0 vs 65.0 W)
- IceRiver KS3M 13% better efficacité (567 vs 650 J/TH)
- Iceriver KS0 83% better weight (14.4 vs 2.5 kg)
- IceRiver KS3M 5130% more heat output (11,601 vs 222 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| IceRiver KS3M | Metric | Iceriver KS0 |
|---|---|---|
| $8,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$7.94 | Daily net profit | -$0.15 |
| -$11,400 | Net after 1 year | -$56 |
| -$14,299 | Net after 2 years | -$111 |
| -$17,199 | Net after 3 years | -$167 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
IceRiver KS3M566.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the IceRiver KS3M or the Iceriver KS0?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS0 is more profitable at $-0.15/day compared to $-7.94/day for the IceRiver KS3M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the IceRiver KS3M or Iceriver KS0?
The IceRiver KS3M is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Iceriver KS0 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
IceRiver KS3M vs Iceriver KS0: which fits a residential setup better?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
IceRiver KS3M vs Iceriver KS0: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The IceRiver KS3M runs at 566.7 J/TH while the Iceriver KS0 runs at 650.0 J/TH — a difference of 83.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 13% better efficacité (567 vs 650 J/TH).