IceRiver KS3M vs Iceriver KS2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS3M | Specification | Iceriver KS2 |
|---|---|---|
| 6.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 2.0 TH/s |
| 3,400 W | Consommation électrique | 1,200 W |
| 566.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 600.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 14.4 kg | Weight | 14.9 kg |
| 11,601 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,094 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 45/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS3M
Iceriver KS2
Based on BTC price of $78,195 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the IceRiver KS3M, which leads on 2 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 200% more hashrate (6.0 vs 2.0 TH/s). The Iceriver KS2 claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the IceRiver KS3M and Iceriver KS2 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- IceRiver KS3M 200% more hashrate (6.0 vs 2.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KS2 65% better power draw (3,400 vs 1,200 W)
- IceRiver KS3M 6% better efficacité (567 vs 600 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS3M 3% better weight (14.4 vs 14.9 kg)
- IceRiver KS3M 183% more heat output (11,601 vs 4,094 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KS2 25% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 45.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| IceRiver KS3M | Metric | Iceriver KS2 |
|---|---|---|
| $8,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $399 |
| -$7.94 | Daily net profit | -$2.81 |
| -$11,400 | Net after 1 year | -$1,424 |
| -$14,299 | Net after 2 years | -$2,449 |
| -$17,199 | Net after 3 years | -$3,474 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KS2Score: 45/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
IceRiver KS3M566.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the IceRiver KS3M or Iceriver KS2 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS2 is more profitable at $-2.81/day compared to $-7.94/day for the IceRiver KS3M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the IceRiver KS3M or Iceriver KS2?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the IceRiver KS3M or the Iceriver KS2?
The Iceriver KS2 scores 45/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the IceRiver KS3M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
IceRiver KS3M vs Iceriver KS2: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The IceRiver KS3M runs at 566.7 J/TH while the Iceriver KS2 runs at 600.0 J/TH — a difference of 33.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 6% better efficacité (567 vs 600 J/TH).