IceRiver KS3M vs Iceriver KS3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS3M | Specification | Iceriver KS3 |
|---|---|---|
| 6.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 8.0 TH/s |
| 3,400 W | Consommation électrique | 3,200 W |
| 566.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 400.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 14.4 kg | Weight | 13.5 kg |
| 11,601 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,918 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS3M
Iceriver KS3
Based on BTC price of $78,195 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Iceriver KS3 l'emporte sur 4 des 4 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 29% better efficacité (567 vs 400 J/TH) in the Iceriver KS3's favour. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the IceRiver KS3M and Iceriver KS3 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Iceriver KS3 33% more hashrate (6.0 vs 8.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KS3 6% better power draw (3,400 vs 3,200 W)
- Iceriver KS3 29% better efficacité (567 vs 400 J/TH)
- Iceriver KS3 6% better weight (14.4 vs 13.5 kg)
- IceRiver KS3M 6% more heat output (11,601 vs 10,918 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| IceRiver KS3M | Metric | Iceriver KS3 |
|---|---|---|
| $8,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $730 |
| -$7.94 | Daily net profit | -$7.39 |
| -$11,400 | Net after 1 year | -$3,428 |
| -$14,299 | Net after 2 years | -$6,126 |
| -$17,199 | Net after 3 years | -$8,824 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KS3400.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
IceRiver KS3M vs Iceriver KS3: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS3 is more profitable at $-7.39/day compared to $-7.94/day for the IceRiver KS3M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
IceRiver KS3M vs Iceriver KS3: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the IceRiver KS3M or the Iceriver KS3?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
How far apart are the IceRiver KS3M and Iceriver KS3 on J/TH?
The IceRiver KS3M runs at 566.7 J/TH while the Iceriver KS3 runs at 400.0 J/TH — a difference of 166.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 29% better efficacité (567 vs 400 J/TH).