Innosilicon A11 Pro vs iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Innosilicon A11 Pro | Specification | iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 |
|---|---|---|
| 2,000.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 280.0 MH/s |
| 2,500 W | Consommation électrique | 220 W |
| 1,250,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 785,714.3 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 40 dB |
| 22.0 kg | Weight | 2.1 kg |
| 8,530 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 751 BTU/hr |
| 40/100 | Home Mining Score | 66/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | EtHash |
| Innosilicon | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
Innosilicon A11 Pro
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280
Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 91% better power draw (2,500 vs 220 W). The Innosilicon A11 Pro holds the edge in hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Innosilicon A11 Pro and iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Innosilicon A11 Pro 614% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 91% better power draw (2,500 vs 220 W)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 37% better efficacité (1,250,000 vs 785,714 J/TH)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 47% better noise (75.0 vs 40.0 dB)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 90% better weight (22.0 vs 2.1 kg)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro 1036% more heat output (8,530 vs 751 BTU/hr)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 65% more score de minage domestique (40.0 vs 66.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Innosilicon A11 Pro | Metric | iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 |
|---|---|---|
| $4,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $700 |
| -$6.00 | Daily net profit | -$0.53 |
| -$6,190 | Net after 1 year | -$893 |
| -$8,380 | Net after 2 years | -$1,085 |
| -$10,570 | Net after 3 years | -$1,278 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280Score: 66/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280785,714.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Innosilicon A11 Pro or the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 is more profitable at $-0.53/day compared to $-6.00/day for the Innosilicon A11 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Innosilicon A11 Pro or iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280?
The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Innosilicon A11 Pro at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Innosilicon A11 Pro or iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280?
The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 scores 66/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 40/100 for the Innosilicon A11 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Innosilicon A11 Pro and iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280?
The Innosilicon A11 Pro runs at 1,250,000.0 J/TH while the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 runs at 785,714.3 J/TH — a difference of 464,285.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 37% better efficacité (1,250,000 vs 785,714 J/TH).
Compare Innosilicon A11 Pro with...
- Innosilicon A11 Pro vs Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro vs Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro vs Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro vs Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro vs Innosilicon A4 Dominator
- Innosilicon A11 Pro vs Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster