Jasminer X16-Q vs Jasminer X4-1U
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Jasminer X16-Q | Specification | Jasminer X4-1U |
|---|---|---|
| 1,950.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 520.0 MH/s |
| 620 W | Consommation électrique | 240 W |
| 317,948.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 461,538.5 J/TH |
| 40 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 10.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 2,115 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 819 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | Etchash |
| Jasminer | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
Jasminer X16-Q
Jasminer X4-1U
Based on BTC price of $78,236 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Jasminer X16-Q edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 275% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Jasminer X16-Q's favour. The Jasminer X4-1U holds the edge in consommation électrique and rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Jasminer X16-Q and Jasminer X4-1U sit on each measurable spec:
- Jasminer X16-Q 275% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Jasminer X4-1U 61% better power draw (620 vs 240 W)
- Jasminer X16-Q 31% better efficacité (317,949 vs 461,538 J/TH)
- Jasminer X16-Q 158% more heat output (2,115 vs 819 BTU/hr)
- Jasminer X16-Q 110% more score de minage domestique (65.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Jasminer X16-Q | Metric | Jasminer X4-1U |
|---|---|---|
| $3,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $209 |
| -$1.49 | Daily net profit | -$0.58 |
| -$4,043 | Net after 1 year | -$419 |
| -$4,586 | Net after 2 years | -$629 |
| -$5,129 | Net after 3 years | -$840 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Jasminer X16-QScore: 65/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X16-Q317,948.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Jasminer X16-Q or the Jasminer X4-1U?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X4-1U is more profitable at $-0.58/day compared to $-1.49/day for the Jasminer X16-Q. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Jasminer X16-Q or Jasminer X4-1U?
The Jasminer X16-Q is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Jasminer X4-1U at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Jasminer X16-Q or the Jasminer X4-1U?
The Jasminer X16-Q scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Jasminer X4-1U). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Jasminer X16-Q vs Jasminer X4-1U: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Jasminer X16-Q runs at 317,948.7 J/TH while the Jasminer X4-1U runs at 461,538.5 J/TH — a difference of 143,589.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 31% better efficacité (317,949 vs 461,538 J/TH).