Goldshell KA BOX Pro vs Bitmain KAS KS7
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell KA BOX Pro | Specification | Bitmain KAS KS7 |
|---|---|---|
| 1.6 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 40.0 TH/s |
| 600 W | Consommation électrique | 3,080 W |
| 375.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 77.0 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 2.6 kg | Weight | 16.4 kg |
| 2,047 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,509 BTU/hr |
| 58/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell KA BOX Pro
Bitmain KAS KS7
Based on BTC price of $78,195 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain KAS KS7 edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 2400% more hashrate (1.6 vs 40.0 TH/s). That said, the Goldshell KA BOX Pro isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell KA BOX Pro and Bitmain KAS KS7 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain KAS KS7 2400% more hashrate (1.6 vs 40.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell KA BOX Pro 81% better power draw (600 vs 3,080 W)
- Bitmain KAS KS7 79% better efficacité (375.0 vs 77.0 J/TH)
- Goldshell KA BOX Pro 27% better noise (55.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Goldshell KA BOX Pro 84% better weight (2.6 vs 16.4 kg)
- Bitmain KAS KS7 413% more heat output (2,047 vs 10,509 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell KA BOX Pro 61% more score de minage domestique (58.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell KA BOX Pro | Metric | Bitmain KAS KS7 |
|---|---|---|
| $129 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,590 |
| -$1.38 | Daily net profit | -$5.95 |
| -$634 | Net after 1 year | -$3,763 |
| -$1,138 | Net after 2 years | -$5,935 |
| -$1,643 | Net after 3 years | -$8,108 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell KA BOX ProScore: 58/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain KAS KS777.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell KA BOX Pro or the Bitmain KAS KS7?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KA BOX Pro is more profitable at $-1.38/day compared to $-5.95/day for the Bitmain KAS KS7. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell KA BOX Pro or the Bitmain KAS KS7 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell KA BOX Pro is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Bitmain KAS KS7 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell KA BOX Pro vs Bitmain KAS KS7: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell KA BOX Pro scores 58/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Bitmain KAS KS7). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell KA BOX Pro and Bitmain KAS KS7?
The Goldshell KA BOX Pro runs at 375.0 J/TH while the Bitmain KAS KS7 runs at 77.0 J/TH — a difference of 298.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 79% better efficacité (375.0 vs 77.0 J/TH).