Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Antminer D9

Antminer D9

Taux de hachage 1,770.0 GH/s Puissance 2,839 W Efficiency 1,604.0 J/TH
VS
Bitmain KAS KS7

Bitmain KAS KS7

Taux de hachage 40.0 TH/s Puissance 3,080 W Efficiency 77.0 J/TH

Antminer D9 vs Bitmain KAS KS7

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer D9 Specification Bitmain KAS KS7
1,770.0 GH/s Taux de hachage 40.0 TH/s
2,839 W Consommation électrique 3,080 W
1,604.0 J/TH Efficiency 77.0 J/TH
75 dB Niveau de bruit 75 dB
16.1 kg Weight 16.4 kg
9,687 BTU/hr BTU Output 10,509 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
X11 Algorithme KHeavyHash
Bitmain Manufacturer Bitmain

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer D9

Daily Revenue 0.00000081 BTC $0.06
Daily Electricity -$6.81
Daily Profit -$6.75
Monthly -$202.50
Yearly -$2,463.72

Bitmain KAS KS7

Daily Revenue 0.00001841 BTC $1.44
Daily Electricity -$7.39
Daily Profit -$5.95
Monthly -$178.58
Yearly -$2,172.71

Based on BTC price of $78,195 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain KAS KS7 edges it: 3 of 4 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 2160% more hashrate (1.8 vs 40.0 TH/s). The Antminer D9 holds the edge in consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Bitmain KAS KS7 — l'emporte sur 3 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Antminer D9 and Bitmain KAS KS7 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Bitmain KAS KS7 2160% more hashrate (1.8 vs 40.0 TH/s)
  • Antminer D9 8% better power draw (2,839 vs 3,080 W)
  • Bitmain KAS KS7 95% better efficacité (1,604.0 vs 77.0 J/TH)
  • Antminer D9 2% better weight (16.1 vs 16.4 kg)
  • Bitmain KAS KS7 8% more heat output (9,687 vs 10,509 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Antminer D9 Metric Bitmain KAS KS7
$3,000 Upfront cost (MSRP) $1,590
-$6.75 Daily net profit -$5.95
-$5,464 Net after 1 year -$3,763
-$7,927 Net after 2 years -$5,935
-$10,391 Net after 3 years -$8,108
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Bitmain KAS KS7

77.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Antminer D9 or Bitmain KAS KS7 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain KAS KS7 is more profitable at $-5.95/day compared to $-6.75/day for the Antminer D9. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Antminer D9 or Bitmain KAS KS7?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Antminer D9 vs Bitmain KAS KS7: which fits a residential setup better?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

What is the efficiency difference between Antminer D9 and Bitmain KAS KS7?

The Antminer D9 runs at 1,604.0 J/TH while the Bitmain KAS KS7 runs at 77.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,527.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 95% better efficacité (1,604.0 vs 77.0 J/TH).