Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra vs Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE |
|---|---|---|
| 400.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 2.0 TH/s |
| 100 W | Consommation électrique | 500 W |
| 250.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 250.0 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | 45 dB |
| 2.5 kg | Weight | 5.0 kg |
| 341 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,706 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 62/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra
Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE
Based on BTC price of $78,210 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 80% better power draw (100 vs 500 W). The Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE holds the edge in hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra and Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE sit on each measurable spec:
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 400% more hashrate (0.4 vs 2.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 80% better power draw (100 vs 500 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 22% better noise (35.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 50% better weight (2.5 vs 5.0 kg)
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 400% more heat output (341 vs 1,706 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 15% more score de minage domestique (71.0 vs 62.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE |
|---|---|---|
| $77 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $458 |
| -$0.23 | Daily net profit | -$1.13 |
| -$159 | Net after 1 year | -$870 |
| -$242 | Net after 2 years | -$1,281 |
| -$324 | Net after 3 years | -$1,693 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KAS KS0 UltraScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
TieBoth miners have comparable efficiency.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra or the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-1.13/day for the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra or the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE at 45 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra vs Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE: which fits a residential setup better?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 62/100 for the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra vs Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra runs at 250.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE runs at 250.0 J/TH — a difference of 0.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.