Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra vs Iceriver KAS KS5M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS5M |
|---|---|---|
| 400.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 15.0 TH/s |
| 100 W | Consommation électrique | 3,400 W |
| 250.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 226.7 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 2.5 kg | Weight | 15.0 kg |
| 341 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra
Iceriver KAS KS5M
Based on BTC price of $78,195 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Iceriver KAS KS5M l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 3650% more hashrate (0.4 vs 15.0 TH/s). The Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra and Iceriver KAS KS5M actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Iceriver KAS KS5M 3650% more hashrate (0.4 vs 15.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 97% better power draw (100 vs 3,400 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS5M 9% better efficacité (250 vs 227 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 53% better noise (35.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 83% better weight (2.5 vs 15.0 kg)
- Iceriver KAS KS5M 3300% more heat output (341 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 97% more score de minage domestique (71.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS5M |
|---|---|---|
| $77 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $449 |
| -$0.23 | Daily net profit | -$7.62 |
| -$159 | Net after 1 year | -$3,230 |
| -$242 | Net after 2 years | -$6,012 |
| -$324 | Net after 3 years | -$8,793 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KAS KS0 UltraScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS5M226.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra or the Iceriver KAS KS5M?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-7.62/day for the Iceriver KAS KS5M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra or Iceriver KAS KS5M?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Iceriver KAS KS5M at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra or Iceriver KAS KS5M?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver KAS KS5M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra and Iceriver KAS KS5M on J/TH?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra runs at 250.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS5M runs at 226.7 J/TH — a difference of 23.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 9% better efficacité (250 vs 227 J/TH).