Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra vs Iceriver KS1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra | Specification | Iceriver KS1 |
|---|---|---|
| 400.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.0 TH/s |
| 100 W | Consommation électrique | 600 W |
| 250.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 600.0 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 2.5 kg | Weight | 14.9 kg |
| 341 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,047 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra
Iceriver KS1
Based on BTC price of $78,195 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra edges it: 5 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 83% better power draw (100 vs 600 W). The Iceriver KS1 claws back ground on hashrate. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra and Iceriver KS1 sit on each measurable spec:
- Iceriver KS1 150% more hashrate (0.4 vs 1.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 83% better power draw (100 vs 600 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 58% better efficacité (250 vs 600 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 53% better noise (35.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 83% better weight (2.5 vs 14.9 kg)
- Iceriver KS1 500% more heat output (341 vs 2,047 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 61% more score de minage domestique (71.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra | Metric | Iceriver KS1 |
|---|---|---|
| $77 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $199 |
| -$0.23 | Daily net profit | -$1.40 |
| -$159 | Net after 1 year | -$711 |
| -$242 | Net after 2 years | -$1,224 |
| -$324 | Net after 3 years | -$1,736 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KAS KS0 UltraScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra250.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra or the Iceriver KS1?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-1.40/day for the Iceriver KS1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra vs Iceriver KS1: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Iceriver KS1 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra or Iceriver KS1?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 44/100 for the Iceriver KS1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra and Iceriver KS1?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra runs at 250.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KS1 runs at 600.0 J/TH — a difference of 350.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 58% better efficacité (250 vs 600 J/TH).