Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra vs Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra | Specification | Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) |
|---|---|---|
| 400.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 10.5 TH/s |
| 100 W | Consommation électrique | 3,600 W |
| 250.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 342.9 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 2.5 kg | Weight | 14.5 kg |
| 341 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,283 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | Dragonball |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra
Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)
Based on BTC price of $78,195 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra, which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 97% better power draw (100 vs 3,600 W) in the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra's favour. The Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) holds the edge in hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra and Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) sit on each measurable spec:
- Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) 2525% more hashrate (0.4 vs 10.5 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 97% better power draw (100 vs 3,600 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 27% better efficacité (250 vs 343 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 53% better noise (35.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 83% better weight (2.5 vs 14.5 kg)
- Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) 3500% more heat output (341 vs 12,283 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 137% more score de minage domestique (71.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra | Metric | Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) |
|---|---|---|
| $77 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,540 |
| -$0.23 | Daily net profit | -$8.26 |
| -$159 | Net after 1 year | -$8,556 |
| -$242 | Net after 2 years | -$11,571 |
| -$324 | Net after 3 years | -$14,587 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KAS KS0 UltraScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra250.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra vs Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-8.26/day for the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra or Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra vs Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T): which fits a residential setup better?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra and Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra runs at 250.0 J/TH while the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) runs at 342.9 J/TH — a difference of 92.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 27% better efficacité (250 vs 343 J/TH).