Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite vs Iceriver KS0
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite | Specification | Iceriver KS0 |
|---|---|---|
| 4.2 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 100.0 GH/s |
| 500 W | Consommation électrique | 65 W |
| 119.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 650.0 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 4.0 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 1,706 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 222 BTU/hr |
| 62/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite
Iceriver KS0
Based on BTC price of $78,195 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 4100% more hashrate (4.2 vs 0.1 TH/s) in the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite's favour. The Iceriver KS0 holds the edge in consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite and Iceriver KS0 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 4100% more hashrate (4.2 vs 0.1 TH/s)
- Iceriver KS0 87% better power draw (500.0 vs 65.0 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 82% better efficacité (119 vs 650 J/TH)
- Iceriver KS0 38% better weight (4.0 vs 2.5 kg)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 669% more heat output (1,706 vs 222 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 72% more score de minage domestique (62.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite | Metric | Iceriver KS0 |
|---|---|---|
| $699 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$1.05 | Daily net profit | -$0.15 |
| -$1,082 | Net after 1 year | -$56 |
| -$1,465 | Net after 2 years | -$111 |
| -$1,848 | Net after 3 years | -$167 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KAS KS7 LiteScore: 62/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite119.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite vs Iceriver KS0: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS0 is more profitable at $-0.15/day compared to $-1.05/day for the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite or Iceriver KS0?
The Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Iceriver KS0 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite or Iceriver KS0?
The Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver KS0). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite and Iceriver KS0?
The Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite runs at 119.1 J/TH while the Iceriver KS0 runs at 650.0 J/TH — a difference of 531.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 82% better efficacité (119 vs 650 J/TH).