Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Bitmain KAS KS7

Bitmain KAS KS7

Taux de hachage 40.0 TH/s Puissance 3,080 W Efficiency 77.0 J/TH
VS
Iceriver KS0

Iceriver KS0

Taux de hachage 100.0 GH/s Puissance 65 W Efficiency 650.0 J/TH

Bitmain KAS KS7 vs Iceriver KS0

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bitmain KAS KS7 Specification Iceriver KS0
40.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 100.0 GH/s
3,080 W Consommation électrique 65 W
77.0 J/TH Efficiency 650.0 J/TH
75 dB Niveau de bruit
16.4 kg Weight 2.5 kg
10,509 BTU/hr BTU Output 222 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
KHeavyHash Algorithme KHeavyHash
Bitmain Manufacturer IceRiver

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bitmain KAS KS7

Daily Revenue 0.00001841 BTC $1.44
Daily Electricity -$7.39
Daily Profit -$5.95
Monthly -$178.58
Yearly -$2,172.71

Iceriver KS0

Daily Revenue 0.00000005 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.16
Daily Profit -$0.15
Monthly -$4.57
Yearly -$55.63

Based on BTC price of $78,195 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain KAS KS7 edges it: 3 of 4 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 39900% more hashrate (40.0 vs 0.1 TH/s). That said, the Iceriver KS0 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Bitmain KAS KS7 — l'emporte sur 3 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

The Bitmain KAS KS7 and Iceriver KS0 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Bitmain KAS KS7 39900% more hashrate (40.0 vs 0.1 TH/s)
  • Iceriver KS0 98% better power draw (3,080.0 vs 65.0 W)
  • Bitmain KAS KS7 88% better efficacité (77.0 vs 650.0 J/TH)
  • Iceriver KS0 85% better weight (16.4 vs 2.5 kg)
  • Bitmain KAS KS7 4638% more heat output (10,509 vs 222 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Bitmain KAS KS7 Metric Iceriver KS0
$1,590 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$5.95 Daily net profit -$0.15
-$3,763 Net after 1 year -$56
-$5,935 Net after 2 years -$111
-$8,108 Net after 3 years -$167
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Bitmain KAS KS7

77.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Bitmain KAS KS7 or Iceriver KS0 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS0 is more profitable at $-0.15/day compared to $-5.95/day for the Bitmain KAS KS7. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Bitmain KAS KS7 or Iceriver KS0?

The Bitmain KAS KS7 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Iceriver KS0 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain KAS KS7 or Iceriver KS0?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain KAS KS7 and Iceriver KS0?

The Bitmain KAS KS7 runs at 77.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KS0 runs at 650.0 J/TH — a difference of 573.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 88% better efficacité (77.0 vs 650.0 J/TH).