Iceriver KS0 vs Iceriver KS3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver KS0 | Specification | Iceriver KS3 |
|---|---|---|
| 100.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 8.0 TH/s |
| 65 W | Consommation électrique | 3,200 W |
| 650.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 400.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 2.5 kg | Weight | 13.5 kg |
| 222 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,918 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver KS0
Iceriver KS3
Based on BTC price of $78,186 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Iceriver KS3, which leads on 3 of 4 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 7900% more hashrate (0.1 vs 8.0 TH/s) in the Iceriver KS3's favour. That said, the Iceriver KS0 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Iceriver KS0 and Iceriver KS3 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Iceriver KS3 7900% more hashrate (0.1 vs 8.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KS0 98% better power draw (65.0 vs 3,200.0 W)
- Iceriver KS3 38% better efficacité (650 vs 400 J/TH)
- Iceriver KS0 81% better weight (2.5 vs 13.5 kg)
- Iceriver KS3 4823% more heat output (222 vs 10,918 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Iceriver KS0 | Metric | Iceriver KS3 |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $730 |
| -$0.15 | Daily net profit | -$7.39 |
| -$56 | Net after 1 year | -$3,428 |
| -$111 | Net after 2 years | -$6,126 |
| -$167 | Net after 3 years | -$8,824 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KS3400.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Iceriver KS0 or Iceriver KS3 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS0 is more profitable at $-0.15/day compared to $-7.39/day for the Iceriver KS3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Iceriver KS0 or the Iceriver KS3 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Iceriver KS3 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Iceriver KS0 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Iceriver KS0 or the Iceriver KS3?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
How far apart are the Iceriver KS0 and Iceriver KS3 on J/TH?
The Iceriver KS0 runs at 650.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KS3 runs at 400.0 J/TH — a difference of 250.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 38% better efficacité (650 vs 400 J/TH).