iPollo V1 vs Jasminer X16-Q
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo V1 | Specification | Jasminer X16-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 3.6 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 1,950.0 MH/s |
| 3,100 W | Consommation électrique | 620 W |
| 861,111.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 317,948.7 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 40 dB |
| 13,000.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 10,577 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,115 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 65/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | EtHash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo V1
Jasminer X16-Q
Based on BTC price of $78,186 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Jasminer X16-Q, which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 80% better power draw (3,100 vs 620 W). The iPollo V1 holds the edge in hashrate. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the iPollo V1 and Jasminer X16-Q actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- iPollo V1 85% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Jasminer X16-Q 80% better power draw (3,100 vs 620 W)
- Jasminer X16-Q 63% better efficacité (861,111 vs 317,949 J/TH)
- iPollo V1 400% more heat output (10,577 vs 2,115 BTU/hr)
- Jasminer X16-Q 195% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 65.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| iPollo V1 | Metric | Jasminer X16-Q |
|---|---|---|
| $1,699 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $789 |
| -$7.44 | Daily net profit | -$1.49 |
| -$4,415 | Net after 1 year | -$1,332 |
| -$7,130 | Net after 2 years | -$1,875 |
| -$9,846 | Net after 3 years | -$2,418 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Jasminer X16-QScore: 65/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X16-Q317,948.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the iPollo V1 or the Jasminer X16-Q?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X16-Q is more profitable at $-1.49/day compared to $-7.44/day for the iPollo V1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the iPollo V1 or the Jasminer X16-Q better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Jasminer X16-Q is quieter at 40 dB compared to the iPollo V1 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the iPollo V1 or Jasminer X16-Q?
The Jasminer X16-Q scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iPollo V1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the iPollo V1 and Jasminer X16-Q on J/TH?
The iPollo V1 runs at 861,111.1 J/TH while the Jasminer X16-Q runs at 317,948.7 J/TH — a difference of 543,162.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 63% better efficacité (861,111 vs 317,949 J/TH).