iPollo V2 vs Jasminer X16-Q pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo V2 | Specification | Jasminer X16-Q pro |
|---|---|---|
| 10.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 2.1 GH/s |
| 1,500 W | Consommation électrique | 520 W |
| 150,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 253,658.5 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 40 dB |
| 16.5 kg | Weight | 10.0 kg |
| 5,118 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,774 BTU/hr |
| 48/100 | Home Mining Score | 65/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | EtHash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo V2
Jasminer X16-Q pro
Based on BTC price of $74,156 and current network difficulty as of Mar 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le iPollo V2 l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Le Jasminer X16-Q pro a l'avantage en consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Consultez les spécifications détaillées et les calculs de rentabilité ci-dessus pour déterminer quel mineur convient le mieux à votre installation.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Jasminer X16-Q proScore: 65/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iPollo V2150,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iPollo V2 or Jasminer X16-Q pro more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X16-Q pro is more profitable at $-1.25/day compared to $-3.60/day for the iPollo V2. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iPollo V2 or Jasminer X16-Q pro?
The Jasminer X16-Q pro is quieter at 40 dB compared to the iPollo V2 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the iPollo V2 or Jasminer X16-Q pro?
The Jasminer X16-Q pro scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 48/100 for the iPollo V2). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iPollo V2 and Jasminer X16-Q pro?
The iPollo V2 runs at 150,000.0 J/TH while the Jasminer X16-Q pro runs at 253,658.5 J/TH — a difference of 103,658.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.