Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

iPollo V2X

iPollo V2X

Taux de hachage 1.2 GH/s Puissance 165 W Efficiency 137,500.0 J/TH
VS
iPollo X1

iPollo X1

Taux de hachage 300.0 MH/s Puissance 240 W Efficiency 800,000.0 J/TH

iPollo V2X vs iPollo X1

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

iPollo V2X Specification iPollo X1
1.2 GH/s Taux de hachage 300.0 MH/s
165 W Consommation électrique 240 W
137,500.0 J/TH Efficiency 800,000.0 J/TH
55 dB Niveau de bruit
1.7 kg Weight 1.5 kg
563 BTU/hr BTU Output 819 BTU/hr
61/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
EtHash Algorithme EtHash
iPollo Manufacturer iPollo

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

iPollo V2X

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.40
Daily Profit -$0.40
Monthly -$11.88
Yearly -$144.52

iPollo X1

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.58
Daily Profit -$0.58
Monthly -$17.28
Yearly -$210.24

Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the iPollo V2X edges it: 5 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 83% better efficacité (137,500 vs 800,000 J/TH). Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: iPollo V2X — l'emporte sur 5 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the iPollo V2X and iPollo X1 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • iPollo V2X 300% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • iPollo V2X 31% better power draw (165 vs 240 W)
  • iPollo V2X 83% better efficacité (137,500 vs 800,000 J/TH)
  • iPollo X1 15% better weight (1.7 vs 1.5 kg)
  • iPollo X1 45% more heat output (563 vs 819 BTU/hr)
  • iPollo V2X 97% more score de minage domestique (61.0 vs 31.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

iPollo V2X Metric iPollo X1
$990 Upfront cost (MSRP) $444
-$0.40 Daily net profit -$0.58
-$1,135 Net after 1 year -$654
-$1,279 Net after 2 years -$864
-$1,424 Net after 3 years -$1,075
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

iPollo V2X

Score: 61/100. 55 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iPollo V2X

137,500.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the iPollo V2X or the iPollo X1?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V2X is more profitable at $-0.40/day compared to $-0.58/day for the iPollo X1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

iPollo V2X vs iPollo X1: which runs at a lower noise level?

The iPollo V2X is quieter at 55 dB compared to the iPollo X1 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the iPollo V2X or iPollo X1?

The iPollo V2X scores 61/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the iPollo X1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

iPollo V2X vs iPollo X1: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The iPollo V2X runs at 137,500.0 J/TH while the iPollo X1 runs at 800,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 662,500.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 83% better efficacité (137,500 vs 800,000 J/TH).