MicroBT Whatsminer M10S vs Whatsminer M50
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10S | Specification | Whatsminer M50 |
|---|---|---|
| 55.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 114.0 TH/s |
| 3,500 W | Consommation électrique | 3,306 W |
| 63.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 29.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 10,700.0 kg | Weight | 12.5 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,280 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| MicroBT | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
MicroBT Whatsminer M10S
Whatsminer M50
Based on BTC price of $77,963 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Whatsminer M50 edges it: 6 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 54% better efficacité (63.6 vs 29.0 J/TH) in the Whatsminer M50's favour. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The MicroBT Whatsminer M10S and Whatsminer M50 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Whatsminer M50 107% more hashrate (55.0 vs 114.0 TH/s)
- Whatsminer M50 6% better power draw (3,500 vs 3,306 W)
- Whatsminer M50 54% better efficacité (63.6 vs 29.0 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M50 100% better weight (10,700.0 vs 12.5 kg)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10S 6% more heat output (11,942 vs 11,280 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M50 64% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10S | Metric | Whatsminer M50 |
|---|---|---|
| $3,800 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,600 |
| -$6.43 | Daily net profit | -$3.84 |
| -$6,146 | Net after 1 year | -$4,003 |
| -$8,492 | Net after 2 years | -$5,406 |
| -$10,837 | Net after 3 years | -$6,810 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M50Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M5029.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
MicroBT Whatsminer M10S vs Whatsminer M50: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M50 is more profitable at $-3.84/day compared to $-6.43/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
MicroBT Whatsminer M10S vs Whatsminer M50: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Whatsminer M50 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S or the Whatsminer M50?
The Whatsminer M50 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
MicroBT Whatsminer M10S vs Whatsminer M50: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The MicroBT Whatsminer M10S runs at 63.6 J/TH while the Whatsminer M50 runs at 29.0 J/TH — a difference of 34.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 54% better efficacité (63.6 vs 29.0 J/TH).