MicroBT Whatsminer M10 vs Whatsminer M50
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10 | Specification | Whatsminer M50 |
|---|---|---|
| 33.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 114.0 TH/s |
| 2,145 W | Consommation électrique | 3,306 W |
| 65.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 29.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 8.6 kg | Weight | 12.5 kg |
| 7,319 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,280 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| MicroBT | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
MicroBT Whatsminer M10
Whatsminer M50
Based on BTC price of $64,351 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Whatsminer M50, which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 245% more hashrate (33.0 vs 114.0 TH/s). That said, the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The MicroBT Whatsminer M10 and Whatsminer M50 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Whatsminer M50 245% more hashrate (33.0 vs 114.0 TH/s)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10 35% better power draw (2,145 vs 3,306 W)
- Whatsminer M50 55% better efficacité (65.0 vs 29.0 J/TH)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10 31% better weight (8.6 vs 12.5 kg)
- Whatsminer M50 54% more heat output (7,319 vs 11,280 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M50 38% more score de minage domestique (26.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10 | Metric | Whatsminer M50 |
|---|---|---|
| $2,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,600 |
| -$4.19 | Daily net profit | -$4.62 |
| -$4,028 | Net after 1 year | -$4,285 |
| -$5,557 | Net after 2 years | -$5,969 |
| -$7,085 | Net after 3 years | -$7,654 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M50Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M5029.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
MicroBT Whatsminer M10 vs Whatsminer M50: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 is more profitable at $-4.19/day compared to $-4.62/day for the Whatsminer M50. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
MicroBT Whatsminer M10 vs Whatsminer M50: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Whatsminer M50 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 or the Whatsminer M50?
The Whatsminer M50 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
MicroBT Whatsminer M10 vs Whatsminer M50: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The MicroBT Whatsminer M10 runs at 65.0 J/TH while the Whatsminer M50 runs at 29.0 J/TH — a difference of 36.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 55% better efficacité (65.0 vs 29.0 J/TH).