Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 vs Ebang Ebit E9i
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 | Specification | Ebang Ebit E9i |
|---|---|---|
| 150.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 13.5 TH/s |
| 3,230 W | Power Consumption | 1,420 W |
| 21.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 105.2 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 13.0 kg | Weight | 5,500.0 kg |
| 11,021 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,845 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | Ebang |
Profitability Comparison
Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466
Ebang Ebit E9i
Based on BTC price of $79,113 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 4 (efficiency, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 1011% more hashrate (150.0 vs 13.5 TH/s). The Ebang Ebit E9i claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 and Ebang Ebit E9i sit on each measurable spec:
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 1011% more hashrate (150.0 vs 13.5 TH/s)
- Ebang Ebit E9i 56% better power draw (3,230 vs 1,420 W)
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 80% better efficiency (21.5 vs 105.2 J/TH)
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 100% better weight (13.0 vs 5,500.0 kg)
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 127% more heat output (11,021 vs 4,845 BTU/hr)
- Ebang Ebit E9i 41% more home mining score (22.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 | Metric | Ebang Ebit E9i |
|---|---|---|
| $937 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$2.29 | Daily net profit | -$2.92 |
| -$1,773 | Net after 1 year | -$1,065 |
| -$2,609 | Net after 2 years | -$2,129 |
| -$3,446 | Net after 3 years | -$3,194 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Ebang Ebit E9iScore: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan AvalonMiner Made A146621.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 vs Ebang Ebit E9i: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 is more profitable at $-2.29/day compared to $-2.92/day for the Ebang Ebit E9i. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 or Ebang Ebit E9i?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 or the Ebang Ebit E9i?
The Ebang Ebit E9i scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 and Ebang Ebit E9i?
The Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 runs at 21.5 J/TH while the Ebang Ebit E9i runs at 105.2 J/TH — a difference of 83.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 80% better efficiency (21.5 vs 105.2 J/TH).