Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs iPollo V1 Mini SE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) | Specification | iPollo V1 Mini SE |
|---|---|---|
| 750.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 220.0 MH/s |
| 1,350 W | Consommation électrique | 116 W |
| 1,800,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 527,272.7 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 8,100.0 kg | Weight | 2.1 kg |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 396 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | EtHash |
| Innosilicon | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
iPollo V1 Mini SE
Based on BTC price of $78,210 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the iPollo V1 Mini SE, which leads on 2 of 4 weighted factors (efficacité, consommation électrique). The standout gap is 91% better power draw (1,350 vs 116 W) in the iPollo V1 Mini SE's favour. The Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) claws back ground on score de minage domestique and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) and iPollo V1 Mini SE sit on each measurable spec:
- Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) 241% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V1 Mini SE 91% better power draw (1,350 vs 116 W)
- iPollo V1 Mini SE 71% better efficacité (1,800,000 vs 527,273 J/TH)
- iPollo V1 Mini SE 100% better weight (8,100.0 vs 2.1 kg)
- Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) 1064% more heat output (4,606 vs 396 BTU/hr)
- Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) 3% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) | Metric | iPollo V1 Mini SE |
|---|---|---|
| $800 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $279 |
| -$3.24 | Daily net profit | -$0.28 |
| -$1,983 | Net after 1 year | -$381 |
| -$3,165 | Net after 2 years | -$482 |
| -$4,348 | Net after 3 years | -$584 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iPollo V1 Mini SE527,272.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) or iPollo V1 Mini SE more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini SE is more profitable at $-0.28/day compared to $-3.24/day for the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs iPollo V1 Mini SE: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) or iPollo V1 Mini SE?
The Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the iPollo V1 Mini SE). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs iPollo V1 Mini SE: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) runs at 1,800,000.0 J/TH while the iPollo V1 Mini SE runs at 527,272.7 J/TH — a difference of 1,272,727.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 71% better efficacité (1,800,000 vs 527,273 J/TH).
Compare Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) with...
- Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs Innosilicon A11 Pro
- Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
- Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs Innosilicon A4 Dominator
- Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster