Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)

Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)

Taux de hachage 750.0 MH/s Puissance 1,350 W Efficiency 1,800,000.0 J/TH
VS
iPollo X1

iPollo X1

Taux de hachage 300.0 MH/s Puissance 240 W Efficiency 800,000.0 J/TH

Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs iPollo X1

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) Specification iPollo X1
750.0 MH/s Taux de hachage 300.0 MH/s
1,350 W Consommation électrique 240 W
1,800,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 800,000.0 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
8,100.0 kg Weight 1.5 kg
4,606 BTU/hr BTU Output 819 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
EtHash Algorithme EtHash
Innosilicon Manufacturer iPollo

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$3.24
Daily Profit -$3.24
Monthly -$97.20
Yearly -$1,182.59

iPollo X1

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.58
Daily Profit -$0.58
Monthly -$17.28
Yearly -$210.24

Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the iPollo X1, which leads on 2 of 3 weighted factors (efficacité, consommation électrique). Where it pulls away hardest is 82% better power draw (1,350 vs 240 W). The Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) holds the edge in rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: iPollo X1 — l'emporte sur 2 des 3 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) and iPollo X1 sit on each measurable spec:

  • Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) 150% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • iPollo X1 82% better power draw (1,350 vs 240 W)
  • iPollo X1 56% better efficacité (1,800,000 vs 800,000 J/TH)
  • iPollo X1 100% better weight (8,100.0 vs 1.5 kg)
  • Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) 462% more heat output (4,606 vs 819 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) Metric iPollo X1
$800 Upfront cost (MSRP) $444
-$3.24 Daily net profit -$0.58
-$1,983 Net after 1 year -$654
-$3,165 Net after 2 years -$864
-$4,348 Net after 3 years -$1,075
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

iPollo X1

800,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) or the iPollo X1?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo X1 is more profitable at $-0.58/day compared to $-3.24/day for the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) or iPollo X1?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) or iPollo X1?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs iPollo X1: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) runs at 1,800,000.0 J/TH while the iPollo X1 runs at 800,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,000,000.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 56% better efficacité (1,800,000 vs 800,000 J/TH).