Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
Innosilicon A8 CryptoMaster
Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A8 CryptoMaster
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) | Specification | Innosilicon A8 CryptoMaster |
|---|---|---|
| 1.5 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 160.0 KH/s |
| 2,350 W | Consommation électrique | 350 W |
| 1,566,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 2,187,500,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| — | Weight | 5,990.0 kg |
| 8,018 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,194 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 34/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | Cryptonight |
| Innosilicon | Manufacturer | Innosilicon |
Profitability Comparison
Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
Innosilicon A8 CryptoMaster
Based on BTC price of $77,048 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) edges it: 2 of 4 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate). The standout gap is 937400% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)'s favour. The Innosilicon A8 CryptoMaster claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) and Innosilicon A8 CryptoMaster sit on each measurable spec:
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) 937400% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Innosilicon A8 CryptoMaster 85% better power draw (2,350 vs 350 W)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) 100% better efficacité (1,566,667 vs 2,187,500,000 J/TH)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) 571% more heat output (8,018 vs 1,194 BTU/hr)
- Innosilicon A8 CryptoMaster 31% more score de minage domestique (26.0 vs 34.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) | Metric | Innosilicon A8 CryptoMaster |
|---|---|---|
| $1,200 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$5.64 | Daily net profit | -$0.84 |
| -$3,259 | Net after 1 year | -$307 |
| -$5,317 | Net after 2 years | -$613 |
| -$7,376 | Net after 3 years | -$920 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Innosilicon A8 CryptoMasterScore: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)1,566,666.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) or Innosilicon A8 CryptoMaster more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Innosilicon A8 CryptoMaster is more profitable at $-0.84/day compared to $-5.64/day for the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) or the Innosilicon A8 CryptoMaster better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) or the Innosilicon A8 CryptoMaster?
The Innosilicon A8 CryptoMaster scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) and Innosilicon A8 CryptoMaster on J/TH?
The Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) runs at 1,566,666.7 J/TH while the Innosilicon A8 CryptoMaster runs at 2,187,500,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 2,185,933,333.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (1,566,667 vs 2,187,500,000 J/TH).
Compare Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) with...
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A11 Pro
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A4 Dominator
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster