Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) | Specification | Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| 1.5 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 9.0 GH/s |
| 2,350 W | Consommation électrique | 2,340 W |
| 1,566,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 260,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| — | Weight | 14.2 kg |
| 8,018 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,984 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 40/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | EtHash |
| Innosilicon | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh)
Based on BTC price of $78,223 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) edges it: 6 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 83% better efficacité (1,566,667 vs 260,000 J/TH) in the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh)'s favour. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) and Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) 500% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) 83% better efficacité (1,566,667 vs 260,000 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) 54% more score de minage domestique (26.0 vs 40.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) | Metric | Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| $1,200 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,399 |
| -$5.64 | Daily net profit | -$5.62 |
| -$3,259 | Net after 1 year | -$7,449 |
| -$5,317 | Net after 2 years | -$9,498 |
| -$7,376 | Net after 3 years | -$11,548 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh)Score: 40/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh)260,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) or the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) is more profitable at $-5.62/day compared to $-5.64/day for the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh): which runs at a lower noise level?
The Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) or the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh)?
The Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) scores 40/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) and Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) on J/TH?
The Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) runs at 1,566,666.7 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) runs at 260,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,306,666.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 83% better efficacité (1,566,667 vs 260,000 J/TH).
Compare Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) with...
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A11 Pro
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A4 Dominator
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster