Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs iPollo X1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) | Specification | iPollo X1 |
|---|---|---|
| 1.5 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 300.0 MH/s |
| 2,350 W | Consommation électrique | 240 W |
| 1,566,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 800,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| — | Weight | 1.5 kg |
| 8,018 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 819 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | EtHash |
| Innosilicon | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
iPollo X1
Based on BTC price of $70,532 and current network difficulty as of Mar 25, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le iPollo X1 l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique). Le Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) a l'avantage en hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. Consultez les spécifications détaillées et les calculs de rentabilité ci-dessus pour déterminer quel mineur convient le mieux à votre installation.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iPollo X1Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iPollo X1800,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) or iPollo X1 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo X1 is more profitable at $-0.58/day compared to $-5.64/day for the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) or iPollo X1?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) or iPollo X1?
The iPollo X1 scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) and iPollo X1?
The Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) runs at 1,566,666.7 J/TH while the iPollo X1 runs at 800,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 766,666.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.
Compare Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) with...
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A11 Pro
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A4 Dominator
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster