Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)

Taux de hachage 1.5 GH/s Puissance 2,350 W Efficiency 1,566,666.7 J/TH
VS
iPollo X1

iPollo X1

Taux de hachage 300.0 MH/s Puissance 240 W Efficiency 800,000.0 J/TH

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs iPollo X1

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) Specification iPollo X1
1.5 GH/s Taux de hachage 300.0 MH/s
2,350 W Consommation électrique 240 W
1,566,666.7 J/TH Efficiency 800,000.0 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
Weight 1.5 kg
8,018 BTU/hr BTU Output 819 BTU/hr
26/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
EtHash Algorithme EtHash
Innosilicon Manufacturer iPollo

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$5.64
Daily Profit -$5.64
Monthly -$169.20
Yearly -$2,058.58

iPollo X1

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.58
Daily Profit -$0.58
Monthly -$17.28
Yearly -$210.24

Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the iPollo X1 comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique). Where it pulls away hardest is 90% better power draw (2,350 vs 240 W). The Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) holds the edge in hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: iPollo X1 — l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) and iPollo X1 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) 400% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • iPollo X1 90% better power draw (2,350 vs 240 W)
  • iPollo X1 49% better efficacité (1,566,667 vs 800,000 J/TH)
  • Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) 879% more heat output (8,018 vs 819 BTU/hr)
  • iPollo X1 19% more score de minage domestique (26.0 vs 31.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) Metric iPollo X1
$1,200 Upfront cost (MSRP) $444
-$5.64 Daily net profit -$0.58
-$3,259 Net after 1 year -$654
-$5,317 Net after 2 years -$864
-$7,376 Net after 3 years -$1,075
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

iPollo X1

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iPollo X1

800,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) or the iPollo X1?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo X1 is more profitable at $-0.58/day compared to $-5.64/day for the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs iPollo X1: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs iPollo X1: which fits a residential setup better?

The iPollo X1 scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) and iPollo X1 on J/TH?

The Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) runs at 1,566,666.7 J/TH while the iPollo X1 runs at 800,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 766,666.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 49% better efficacité (1,566,667 vs 800,000 J/TH).