Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Innosilicon A5 DashMaster

Innosilicon A5 DashMaster

Taux de hachage 32.5 GH/s Puissance 750 W Efficiency 23,076.9 J/TH
VS
Bitmain Antminer D3 (19.3Gh)

Bitmain Antminer D3 (19.3Gh)

Taux de hachage 19.3 GH/s Puissance 1,350 W Efficiency 69,948.2 J/TH

Innosilicon A5 DashMaster vs Bitmain Antminer D3 (19.3Gh)

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Innosilicon A5 DashMaster Specification Bitmain Antminer D3 (19.3Gh)
32.5 GH/s Taux de hachage 19.3 GH/s
750 W Consommation électrique 1,350 W
23,076.9 J/TH Efficiency 69,948.2 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
3,100.0 kg Weight 5,500.0 kg
2,559 BTU/hr BTU Output 4,606 BTU/hr
30/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
X11 Algorithme X11
Innosilicon Manufacturer Bitmain

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Innosilicon A5 DashMaster

Daily Revenue 0.00000001 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.80
Daily Profit -$1.80
Monthly -$53.96
Yearly -$656.57

Bitmain Antminer D3 (19.3Gh)

Daily Revenue 0.00000001 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$3.24
Daily Profit -$3.24
Monthly -$97.18
Yearly -$1,182.35

Based on BTC price of $78,274 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Innosilicon A5 DashMaster comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 4 (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique). The standout gap is 67% better efficacité (23,077 vs 69,948 J/TH) in the Innosilicon A5 DashMaster's favour. The Bitmain Antminer D3 (19.3Gh) claws back ground on score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Innosilicon A5 DashMaster — l'emporte sur 3 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

The Innosilicon A5 DashMaster and Bitmain Antminer D3 (19.3Gh) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Innosilicon A5 DashMaster 68% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Innosilicon A5 DashMaster 44% better power draw (750 vs 1,350 W)
  • Innosilicon A5 DashMaster 67% better efficacité (23,077 vs 69,948 J/TH)
  • Innosilicon A5 DashMaster 44% better weight (3,100 vs 5,500 kg)
  • Bitmain Antminer D3 (19.3Gh) 80% more heat output (2,559 vs 4,606 BTU/hr)
  • Bitmain Antminer D3 (19.3Gh) 3% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 31.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Bitmain Antminer D3 (19.3Gh)

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Innosilicon A5 DashMaster

23,076.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Innosilicon A5 DashMaster or the Bitmain Antminer D3 (19.3Gh)?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Innosilicon A5 DashMaster is more profitable at $-1.80/day compared to $-3.24/day for the Bitmain Antminer D3 (19.3Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Innosilicon A5 DashMaster vs Bitmain Antminer D3 (19.3Gh): which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Innosilicon A5 DashMaster or the Bitmain Antminer D3 (19.3Gh)?

The Bitmain Antminer D3 (19.3Gh) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Innosilicon A5 DashMaster). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Innosilicon A5 DashMaster and Bitmain Antminer D3 (19.3Gh) on J/TH?

The Innosilicon A5 DashMaster runs at 23,076.9 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer D3 (19.3Gh) runs at 69,948.2 J/TH — a difference of 46,871.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 67% better efficacité (23,077 vs 69,948 J/TH).