Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Innosilicon A8 CryptoMaster

Innosilicon A8 CryptoMaster

Taux de hachage 160.0 KH/s Puissance 350 W Efficiency 2,187,500,000.0 J/TH
VS
Baikal BK-N240

Baikal BK-N240

Taux de hachage 480.0 KH/s Puissance 650 W Efficiency 1,354,166,666.7 J/TH

Innosilicon A8 CryptoMaster vs Baikal BK-N240

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Innosilicon A8 CryptoMaster Specification Baikal BK-N240
160.0 KH/s Taux de hachage 480.0 KH/s
350 W Consommation électrique 650 W
2,187,500,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 1,354,166,666.7 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
5,990.0 kg Weight 6,500.0 kg
1,194 BTU/hr BTU Output 2,218 BTU/hr
34/100 Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
Cryptonight Algorithme Cryptonight
Innosilicon Manufacturer Baikal

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Innosilicon A8 CryptoMaster

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.84
Daily Profit -$0.84
Monthly -$25.20
Yearly -$306.60

Baikal BK-N240

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.56
Daily Profit -$1.56
Monthly -$46.80
Yearly -$569.40

Based on BTC price of $77,087 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

The Innosilicon A8 CryptoMaster and Baikal BK-N240 finish in a near dead heat in our weighted scoring. There is no wrong answer here — let your electricity rate, noise tolerance and budget break the tie using the breakdowns above.

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Innosilicon A8 CryptoMaster and Baikal BK-N240 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Baikal BK-N240 200% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Innosilicon A8 CryptoMaster 46% better power draw (350 vs 650 W)
  • Baikal BK-N240 38% better efficacité (2,187,500,000 vs 1,354,166,667 J/TH)
  • Innosilicon A8 CryptoMaster 8% better weight (5,990 vs 6,500 kg)
  • Baikal BK-N240 86% more heat output (1,194 vs 2,218 BTU/hr)
  • Innosilicon A8 CryptoMaster 13% more score de minage domestique (34.0 vs 30.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Innosilicon A8 CryptoMaster

Score: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Baikal BK-N240

1,354,166,666.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Innosilicon A8 CryptoMaster or the Baikal BK-N240?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Innosilicon A8 CryptoMaster is more profitable at $-0.84/day compared to $-1.56/day for the Baikal BK-N240. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Innosilicon A8 CryptoMaster vs Baikal BK-N240: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Innosilicon A8 CryptoMaster or Baikal BK-N240?

The Innosilicon A8 CryptoMaster scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Baikal BK-N240). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Innosilicon A8 CryptoMaster vs Baikal BK-N240: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Innosilicon A8 CryptoMaster runs at 2,187,500,000.0 J/TH while the Baikal BK-N240 runs at 1,354,166,666.7 J/TH — a difference of 833,333,333.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 38% better efficacité (2,187,500,000 vs 1,354,166,667 J/TH).