Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell KD-BOX Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Specification | Goldshell KD-BOX Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 54.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 2.6 TH/s |
| 530 W | Consommation électrique | 230 W |
| 9,814,814.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 88.5 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 3.0 kg | Weight | 2,000.0 kg |
| 1,808 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 785 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Blake2s |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX II
Goldshell KD-BOX Pro
Based on BTC price of $76,896 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell KD-BOX Pro l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficacité (9,814,814.8 vs 88.5 J/TH). The Goldshell AE-BOX II claws back ground on score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell KD-BOX Pro actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 4814715% more hashrate (0.0 vs 2.6 TH/s)
- Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 57% better power draw (530 vs 230 W)
- Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 100% better efficacité (9,814,814.8 vs 88.5 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 100% better weight (3.0 vs 2,000.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 130% more heat output (1,808 vs 785 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 110% more score de minage domestique (65.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Metric | Goldshell KD-BOX Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $278 |
| -$1.27 | Daily net profit | -$0.46 |
| -$584 | Net after 1 year | -$446 |
| -$1,049 | Net after 2 years | -$614 |
| -$1,513 | Net after 3 years | -$782 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOX IIScore: 65/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KD-BOX Pro88.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX II or Goldshell KD-BOX Pro more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro is more profitable at $-0.46/day compared to $-1.27/day for the Goldshell AE-BOX II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell KD-BOX Pro: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE-BOX II or the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell KD-BOX Pro: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II runs at 9,814,814.8 J/TH while the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro runs at 88.5 J/TH — a difference of 9,814,726.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (9,814,814.8 vs 88.5 J/TH).