Goldshell AE Max II vs Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 2.0 GH/s |
| 3,200 W | Consommation électrique | 3,580 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,790,000.0 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 15.0 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,215 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Zksnark |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)
Based on BTC price of $78,252 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 270% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Goldshell AE Max II claws back ground on consommation électrique and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE Max II and Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) sit on each measurable spec:
- Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) 270% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE Max II 11% better power draw (3,200 vs 3,580 W)
- Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) 70% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 1,790,000 J/TH)
- Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) 12% better noise (85.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Goldshell AE Max II 17% better weight (12.5 vs 15.0 kg)
- Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) 12% more heat output (10,918 vs 12,215 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) 3% more score de minage domestique (29.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,390 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$8.59 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$8,526 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$11,662 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$14,798 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)Score: 30/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)1,790,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE Max II or Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE Max II is more profitable at $-7.68/day compared to $-8.59/day for the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE Max II or the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Goldshell AE Max II at 85 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s): which fits a residential setup better?
The Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Goldshell AE Max II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) runs at 1,790,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 4,135,925.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 70% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 1,790,000 J/TH).