Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell KD6-SE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell KD6-SE |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 25.3 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Consommation électrique | 2,300 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 90.9 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 8,500.0 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,848 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Blake2s |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell KD6-SE
Based on BTC price of $76,884 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell KD6-SE comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 100% better efficacité (9,166,666.7 vs 90.9 J/TH) in the Goldshell KD6-SE's favour. The Goldshell AE Max claws back ground on score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell KD6-SE actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell KD6-SE 7027678% more hashrate (0.0 vs 25.3 TH/s)
- Goldshell KD6-SE 30% better power draw (3,300 vs 2,300 W)
- Goldshell KD6-SE 100% better efficacité (9,166,666.7 vs 90.9 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Max 100% better weight (13.5 vs 8,500.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max 43% more heat output (11,260 vs 7,848 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max 92% more score de minage domestique (50.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell KD6-SE |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,016 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$4.62 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$2,704 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$4,392 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$6,080 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE MaxScore: 50/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KD6-SE90.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell KD6-SE: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KD6-SE is more profitable at $-4.62/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell KD6-SE: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE Max is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Goldshell KD6-SE at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell KD6-SE?
The Goldshell AE Max scores 50/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Goldshell KD6-SE). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell KD6-SE on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell KD6-SE runs at 90.9 J/TH — a difference of 9,166,575.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (9,166,666.7 vs 90.9 J/TH).