Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) vs Goldshell E-AL1M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) | Specification | Goldshell E-AL1M |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 4.4 TH/s |
| 180 W | Consommation électrique | 1,800 W |
| 500.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 409.1 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 2.2 kg | Weight | — |
| 614 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,142 BTU/hr |
| 33/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh)
Goldshell E-AL1M
Based on BTC price of $78,203 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell E-AL1M l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 1122% more hashrate (0.4 vs 4.4 TH/s). That said, the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) and Goldshell E-AL1M sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell E-AL1M 1122% more hashrate (0.4 vs 4.4 TH/s)
- Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) 90% better power draw (180 vs 1,800 W)
- Goldshell E-AL1M 18% better efficacité (500 vs 409 J/TH)
- Goldshell E-AL1M 900% more heat output (614 vs 6,142 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) 18% more score de minage domestique (33.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) | Metric | Goldshell E-AL1M |
|---|---|---|
| $340 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $799 |
| -$0.42 | Daily net profit | -$4.16 |
| -$493 | Net after 1 year | -$2,318 |
| -$646 | Net after 2 years | -$3,837 |
| -$799 | Net after 3 years | -$5,356 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh)Score: 33/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell E-AL1M409.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) or the Goldshell E-AL1M?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) is more profitable at $-0.42/day compared to $-4.16/day for the Goldshell E-AL1M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) or Goldshell E-AL1M?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) or the Goldshell E-AL1M?
The Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) scores 33/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Goldshell E-AL1M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) vs Goldshell E-AL1M: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) runs at 500.0 J/TH while the Goldshell E-AL1M runs at 409.1 J/TH — a difference of 90.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 18% better efficacité (500 vs 409 J/TH).