Iceriver ALPH AL0 vs Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver ALPH AL0 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 400.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 16.6 TH/s |
| 100 W | Consommation électrique | 3,730 W |
| 250.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 224.7 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 2.5 kg | Weight | 13.6 kg |
| 341 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,727 BTU/hr |
| 64/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | Blake3 |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver ALPH AL0
Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro
Based on BTC price of $78,236 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Scored side by side, the Iceriver ALPH AL0 and Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro trade blows evenly. Neither pulls ahead decisively, so the deciding factor is which spec matters most to your setup — the panels above lay that out.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Iceriver ALPH AL0 and Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro 4050% more hashrate (0.4 vs 16.6 TH/s)
- Iceriver ALPH AL0 97% better power draw (100 vs 3,730 W)
- Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro 10% better efficacité (250 vs 225 J/TH)
- Iceriver ALPH AL0 33% better noise (50.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Iceriver ALPH AL0 82% better weight (2.5 vs 13.6 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro 3630% more heat output (341 vs 12,727 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver ALPH AL0 113% more score de minage domestique (64.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Iceriver ALPH AL0 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $178 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $9,100 |
| -$0.23 | Daily net profit | -$8.35 |
| -$260 | Net after 1 year | -$12,149 |
| -$343 | Net after 2 years | -$15,199 |
| -$425 | Net after 3 years | -$18,248 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver ALPH AL0Score: 64/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro224.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Iceriver ALPH AL0 vs Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver ALPH AL0 is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-8.35/day for the Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Iceriver ALPH AL0 vs Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Iceriver ALPH AL0 is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Iceriver ALPH AL0 or Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro?
The Iceriver ALPH AL0 scores 64/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Iceriver ALPH AL0 and Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro?
The Iceriver ALPH AL0 runs at 250.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro runs at 224.7 J/TH — a difference of 25.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 10% better efficacité (250 vs 225 J/TH).