Antminer D7 vs Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer D7 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 1,286.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 40.0 TH/s |
| 3,148 W | Consommation électrique | 2,200 W |
| 2,447.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 55.0 J/TH |
| 70 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14.4 kg | Weight | 11,500.0 kg |
| 10,741 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,506 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| X11 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer D7
Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,205 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 98% better efficacité (2,447.9 vs 55.0 J/TH) in the Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th)'s favour. The Antminer D7 claws back ground on score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer D7 and Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) 3010% more hashrate (1.3 vs 40.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) 30% better power draw (3,148 vs 2,200 W)
- Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) 98% better efficacité (2,447.9 vs 55.0 J/TH)
- Antminer D7 100% better weight (14.4 vs 11,500.0 kg)
- Antminer D7 43% more heat output (10,741 vs 7,506 BTU/hr)
- Antminer D7 38% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer D7 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $2,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $155 |
| -$7.51 | Daily net profit | -$3.84 |
| -$5,241 | Net after 1 year | -$1,557 |
| -$7,982 | Net after 2 years | -$2,959 |
| -$10,722 | Net after 3 years | -$4,360 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer D7Score: 36/100. 70 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th)55.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer D7 or Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) is more profitable at $-3.84/day compared to $-7.51/day for the Antminer D7. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer D7 vs Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th): which runs at a lower noise level?
The Antminer D7 is quieter at 70 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer D7 or the Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th)?
The Antminer D7 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer D7 and Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) on J/TH?
The Antminer D7 runs at 2,447.9 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) runs at 55.0 J/TH — a difference of 2,392.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 98% better efficacité (2,447.9 vs 55.0 J/TH).