Antminer E9 Pro vs Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer E9 Pro | Specification | Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 3,680.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 40.0 TH/s |
| 2,200 W | Consommation électrique | 2,200 W |
| 597,826.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 55.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14.2 kg | Weight | 11,500.0 kg |
| 7,506 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,506 BTU/hr |
| 40/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer E9 Pro
Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,175 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 100% better efficacité (597,826.1 vs 55.0 J/TH). That said, the Antminer E9 Pro isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer E9 Pro and Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) 1086857% more hashrate (0.0 vs 40.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) 100% better efficacité (597,826.1 vs 55.0 J/TH)
- Antminer E9 Pro 100% better weight (14.2 vs 11,500.0 kg)
- Antminer E9 Pro 54% more score de minage domestique (40.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer E9 Pro | Metric | Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $155 |
| -$5.28 | Daily net profit | -$3.84 |
| -$4,927 | Net after 1 year | -$1,557 |
| -$6,854 | Net after 2 years | -$2,959 |
| -$8,781 | Net after 3 years | -$4,361 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer E9 ProScore: 40/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th)55.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer E9 Pro or the Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) is more profitable at $-3.84/day compared to $-5.28/day for the Antminer E9 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer E9 Pro or Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th)?
The Antminer E9 Pro is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer E9 Pro or Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th)?
The Antminer E9 Pro scores 40/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer E9 Pro vs Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer E9 Pro runs at 597,826.1 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) runs at 55.0 J/TH — a difference of 597,771.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (597,826.1 vs 55.0 J/TH).