Antminer D9 vs Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer D9 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 1,770.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 40.0 TH/s |
| 2,839 W | Consommation électrique | 2,200 W |
| 1,604.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 55.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 16.1 kg | Weight | 11,500.0 kg |
| 9,687 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,506 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| X11 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer D9
Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th)
Based on BTC price of $76,996 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 97% better efficacité (1,604.0 vs 55.0 J/TH) in the Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th)'s favour. The Antminer D9 holds the edge in score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer D9 and Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) 2160% more hashrate (1.8 vs 40.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) 23% better power draw (2,839 vs 2,200 W)
- Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) 97% better efficacité (1,604.0 vs 55.0 J/TH)
- Antminer D9 100% better weight (16.1 vs 11,500.0 kg)
- Antminer D9 29% more heat output (9,687 vs 7,506 BTU/hr)
- Antminer D9 38% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer D9 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $155 |
| -$6.75 | Daily net profit | -$3.86 |
| -$5,464 | Net after 1 year | -$1,565 |
| -$7,928 | Net after 2 years | -$2,975 |
| -$10,392 | Net after 3 years | -$4,385 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer D9Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th)55.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer D9 or the Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) is more profitable at $-3.86/day compared to $-6.75/day for the Antminer D9. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer D9 vs Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th): which runs at a lower noise level?
The Antminer D9 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer D9 or Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th)?
The Antminer D9 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer D9 and Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th)?
The Antminer D9 runs at 1,604.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) runs at 55.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,549.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 97% better efficacité (1,604.0 vs 55.0 J/TH).