Antminer D7 vs Baikal Miner Cube
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer D7 | Specification | Baikal Miner Cube |
|---|---|---|
| 1,286.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 300.0 MH/s |
| 3,148 W | Consommation électrique | 90 W |
| 2,447.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 300,000.0 J/TH |
| 70 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14.4 kg | Weight | — |
| 10,741 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 307 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| X11 | Algorithme | X11 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Baikal |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer D7
Baikal Miner Cube
Based on BTC price of $78,184 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Antminer D7, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 428567% more hashrate (1.3 vs 0.0 TH/s). That said, the Baikal Miner Cube isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer D7 and Baikal Miner Cube actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer D7 428567% more hashrate (1.3 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Baikal Miner Cube 97% better power draw (3,148.0 vs 90.0 W)
- Antminer D7 99% better efficacité (2,448 vs 300,000 J/TH)
- Antminer D7 3398% more heat output (10,741 vs 307 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer D7 | Metric | Baikal Miner Cube |
|---|---|---|
| $2,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,000 |
| -$7.51 | Daily net profit | -$0.22 |
| -$5,241 | Net after 1 year | -$1,079 |
| -$7,982 | Net after 2 years | -$1,158 |
| -$10,722 | Net after 3 years | -$1,236 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer D72,447.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer D7 vs Baikal Miner Cube: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal Miner Cube is more profitable at $-0.22/day compared to $-7.51/day for the Antminer D7. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer D7 or Baikal Miner Cube?
The Antminer D7 is quieter at 70 dB compared to the Baikal Miner Cube at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer D7 or the Baikal Miner Cube?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer D7 and Baikal Miner Cube?
The Antminer D7 runs at 2,447.9 J/TH while the Baikal Miner Cube runs at 300,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 297,552.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 99% better efficacité (2,448 vs 300,000 J/TH).