Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) vs PinIdea DR-100
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) | Specification | PinIdea DR-100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1,770.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 19.0 GH/s |
| 2,839 W | Consommation électrique | 900 W |
| 1,604.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 47,368.4 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 16.1 kg | Weight | 5,000.0 kg |
| 9,687 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 3,071 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| X11 | Algorithme | X11 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | PinIdea |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh)
PinIdea DR-100
Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh), which leads on 2 of 4 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate). The standout gap is 9216% more hashrate (1.8 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh)'s favour. That said, the PinIdea DR-100 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) and PinIdea DR-100 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) 9216% more hashrate (1.8 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- PinIdea DR-100 68% better power draw (2,839 vs 900 W)
- Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) 97% better efficacité (1,604 vs 47,368 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) 100% better weight (16.1 vs 5,000.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) 215% more heat output (9,687 vs 3,071 BTU/hr)
- PinIdea DR-100 41% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) | Metric | PinIdea DR-100 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,030 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$6.75 | Daily net profit | -$2.16 |
| -$3,494 | Net after 1 year | -$788 |
| -$5,957 | Net after 2 years | -$1,576 |
| -$8,421 | Net after 3 years | -$2,364 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
PinIdea DR-100Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh)1,604.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) or the PinIdea DR-100?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the PinIdea DR-100 is more profitable at $-2.16/day compared to $-6.75/day for the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) or PinIdea DR-100?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) or PinIdea DR-100?
The PinIdea DR-100 scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) and PinIdea DR-100?
The Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) runs at 1,604.0 J/TH while the PinIdea DR-100 runs at 47,368.4 J/TH — a difference of 45,764.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 97% better efficacité (1,604 vs 47,368 J/TH).