Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh) vs iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh) | Specification | iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus |
|---|---|---|
| 9.5 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 400.0 MH/s |
| 2,470 W | Consommation électrique | 232 W |
| 260,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 580,000.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14.2 kg | Weight | 2.4 kg |
| 8,428 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 792 BTU/hr |
| 40/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | EtHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh)
iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus
Based on BTC price of $78,184 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh), which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 2275% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). That said, the iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh) and iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh) 2275% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus 91% better power draw (2,470 vs 232 W)
- Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh) 55% better efficacité (260,000 vs 580,000 J/TH)
- iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus 83% better weight (14.2 vs 2.4 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh) 965% more heat output (8,428 vs 792 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh) 29% more score de minage domestique (40.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh) | Metric | iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus |
|---|---|---|
| $1,902 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $399 |
| -$5.93 | Daily net profit | -$0.56 |
| -$4,066 | Net after 1 year | -$602 |
| -$6,229 | Net after 2 years | -$805 |
| -$8,393 | Net after 3 years | -$1,009 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh)Score: 40/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh)260,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh) vs iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus is more profitable at $-0.56/day compared to $-5.93/day for the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh) vs iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh) is quieter at 75 dB compared to the iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh) vs iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus: which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh) scores 40/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh) and iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh) runs at 260,000.0 J/TH while the iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus runs at 580,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 320,000.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 55% better efficacité (260,000 vs 580,000 J/TH).