Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) vs iPollo V2X
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) | Specification | iPollo V2X |
|---|---|---|
| 2.4 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.2 GH/s |
| 2,556 W | Consommation électrique | 165 W |
| 1,065,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 137,500.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 55 dB |
| 14,200.0 kg | Weight | 1.7 kg |
| 8,721 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 563 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 61/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | EtHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh)
iPollo V2X
Based on BTC price of $78,195 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the iPollo V2X edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 94% better power draw (2,556 vs 165 W) in the iPollo V2X's favour. The Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) claws back ground on hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) and iPollo V2X diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) 100% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V2X 94% better power draw (2,556 vs 165 W)
- iPollo V2X 87% better efficacité (1,065,000 vs 137,500 J/TH)
- iPollo V2X 100% better weight (14,200.0 vs 1.7 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) 1449% more heat output (8,721 vs 563 BTU/hr)
- iPollo V2X 177% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 61.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) | Metric | iPollo V2X |
|---|---|---|
| $1,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $990 |
| -$6.13 | Daily net profit | -$0.40 |
| -$3,239 | Net after 1 year | -$1,135 |
| -$5,478 | Net after 2 years | -$1,279 |
| -$7,717 | Net after 3 years | -$1,424 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iPollo V2XScore: 61/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iPollo V2X137,500.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) or iPollo V2X more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V2X is more profitable at $-0.40/day compared to $-6.13/day for the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) or the iPollo V2X better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The iPollo V2X is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) vs iPollo V2X: which fits a residential setup better?
The iPollo V2X scores 61/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) and iPollo V2X?
The Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) runs at 1,065,000.0 J/TH while the iPollo V2X runs at 137,500.0 J/TH — a difference of 927,500.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 87% better efficacité (1,065,000 vs 137,500 J/TH).