Antminer K7 vs iBeLink BM-N3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer K7 | Specification | iBeLink BM-N3 |
|---|---|---|
| 63.5 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 25.0 TH/s |
| 3,080 W | Consommation électrique | 3,300 W |
| 48.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 132.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 10,509 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,260 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithme | Eaglesong |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer K7
iBeLink BM-N3
Based on BTC price of $78,184 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Antminer K7 edges it: 5 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 63% better efficacité (48.5 vs 132.0 J/TH). The iBeLink BM-N3 claws back ground on rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer K7 and iBeLink BM-N3 sit on each measurable spec:
- Antminer K7 154% more hashrate (63.5 vs 25.0 TH/s)
- Antminer K7 7% better power draw (3,080 vs 3,300 W)
- Antminer K7 63% better efficacité (48.5 vs 132.0 J/TH)
- iBeLink BM-N3 7% more heat output (10,509 vs 11,260 BTU/hr)
- Antminer K7 64% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer K7 | Metric | iBeLink BM-N3 |
|---|---|---|
| $3,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $980 |
| -$5.11 | Daily net profit | -$7.02 |
| -$5,364 | Net after 1 year | -$3,542 |
| -$7,228 | Net after 2 years | -$6,105 |
| -$9,093 | Net after 3 years | -$8,667 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer K7Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer K748.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer K7 or iBeLink BM-N3 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer K7 is more profitable at $-5.11/day compared to $-7.02/day for the iBeLink BM-N3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer K7 or iBeLink BM-N3?
The Antminer K7 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the iBeLink BM-N3 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer K7 or the iBeLink BM-N3?
The Antminer K7 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iBeLink BM-N3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer K7 and iBeLink BM-N3?
The Antminer K7 runs at 48.5 J/TH while the iBeLink BM-N3 runs at 132.0 J/TH — a difference of 83.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 63% better efficacité (48.5 vs 132.0 J/TH).