Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) vs IceRiver KS1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) | Specification | IceRiver KS1 |
|---|---|---|
| 8.3 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.0 TH/s |
| 3,188 W | Consommation électrique | 600 W |
| 384.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 600.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 65 dB |
| — | Weight | 15.0 kg |
| 10,878 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,047 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 51/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th)
IceRiver KS1
Based on BTC price of $78,210 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 730% more hashrate (8.3 vs 1.0 TH/s). The IceRiver KS1 holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) and IceRiver KS1 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) 730% more hashrate (8.3 vs 1.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS1 81% better power draw (3,188 vs 600 W)
- Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) 36% better efficacité (384 vs 600 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) 431% more heat output (10,878 vs 2,047 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS1 132% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 51.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) | Metric | IceRiver KS1 |
|---|---|---|
| $3,850 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,500 |
| -$7.35 | Daily net profit | -$1.40 |
| -$6,534 | Net after 1 year | -$3,012 |
| -$9,217 | Net after 2 years | -$3,525 |
| -$11,901 | Net after 3 years | -$4,037 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS1Score: 51/100. 65 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th)384.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) or the IceRiver KS1?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS1 is more profitable at $-1.40/day compared to $-7.35/day for the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) vs IceRiver KS1: which runs at a lower noise level?
The IceRiver KS1 is quieter at 65 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) or the IceRiver KS1?
The IceRiver KS1 scores 51/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) and IceRiver KS1?
The Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) runs at 384.1 J/TH while the IceRiver KS1 runs at 600.0 J/TH — a difference of 215.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 36% better efficacité (384 vs 600 J/TH).