Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) vs Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| 9.4 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 4.2 TH/s |
| 3,500 W | Consommation électrique | 500 W |
| 372.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 119.1 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| 17.7 kg | Weight | 4.0 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,706 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 62/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th)
Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite
Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite, which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 86% better power draw (3,500 vs 500 W). The Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) holds the edge in hashrate. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) and Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) 124% more hashrate (9.4 vs 4.2 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 86% better power draw (3,500 vs 500 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 68% better efficacité (372 vs 119 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 77% better weight (17.7 vs 4.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) 600% more heat output (11,942 vs 1,706 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 182% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 62.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| $2,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $699 |
| -$8.06 | Daily net profit | -$1.05 |
| -$5,443 | Net after 1 year | -$1,082 |
| -$8,385 | Net after 2 years | -$1,465 |
| -$11,328 | Net after 3 years | -$1,847 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KAS KS7 LiteScore: 62/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite119.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) or Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite is more profitable at $-1.05/day compared to $-8.06/day for the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) or the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) or the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite?
The Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) and Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite?
The Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) runs at 372.3 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite runs at 119.1 J/TH — a difference of 253.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 68% better efficacité (372 vs 119 J/TH).